Cases 31 - 40 of 263
LULAC v. Guillen
as 22-50407
Plaintiff / Appellee:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sheila Jackson Lee, Alexander Green, Jasmine Crockett and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Texas House Members, Ryan Guillen, Brooks Landgraf, and John Lujan, Ryan Guillen, Texas House Member, Brooks Landgraf, Texas House Member and others
Acevedo v. Diaz
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Acevedo
Defendant:
Dr. Horacio Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
King v. Lubbock County et al
as 5:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terrance King
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Well Path Medical Services, Sgt. Tracy Marie Sasin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Erin Wade, Janie Torres, Brisenia Flores and others
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas and Art Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Acevedo
as 22-20208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Aundre Howard
Defendant / Appellant:
Art Acevedo
Acevedo v. RRRB
as 22-60187
Petitioner:
Robert R. Acevedo
Respondent:
United States Railroad Retirement Board
Acevedo v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Howard v. Acevedo
as 22-20148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Aundre Howard
Defendant / Appellant:
Art Acevedo
Gonzales v. Hidalgo et al
as 4:2021cv04235
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzales
Defendant:
Lina Hidalgo, Ed Gonzalez, Art Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
