Cases 31 - 40 of 41
USA v. Diogenes Ascencio-Lemu
as 10-41110
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DIOGENES ASCENCIO-LEMUS
Gutierrez et al v. Trevino et al
as 5:2010cv00735
Plaintiff:
Estate of Andres L. Gutierrez, Deceased, Ascencio Gutierrez and Ramona L. Gutierrez
Defendant:
Frio County Sheriff's Office, Roger Salinas and Lionel Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Gonzalez Hernandez v. United States of America;
as 2:2010cv00271
Petitioner:
Felipe Ascencio Gonzalez Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ascencio v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2010cv00049
Petitioner:
Antonio Jose Ascencio
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ascencio v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2010cv00064
Petitioner:
Antonio Jose Ascencio
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Argumedo-Ascencio v. Holder
as 09-60098
Petitioner:
JUAN VICENTE ARGUMEDO-ASCENCIO, also known as Jose Qunitero, also known as Juan Vincente Argumedo
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Ascencio
as 08-40956
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WALLACE MCDONALD ASCENCIO
Ascencio v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv09027
Plaintiff:
William Ascencio, William Ascencio, William Ascencio and others
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Martinez et al v. United States Department of Agriculture; et al
as 7:2007cv00076
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Housing Service and Jose Ascencio
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Martinez and Aurora Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
