Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2019cv13747
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charise Logan v. Homeland Security, et al
as 19-11208
Defendant / Appellee:
HOMELAND SECURITY, BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OVERLAND PARK KANSAS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARISE L. LOGAN
Banks v. Chevron et al
as 3:2019cv00287
Respondent:
NASA Administration, Texico, EPA and others
Petitioner:
In re: Greta Tuneberg and Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Logan v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv01908
Defendant:
George D Bush, Richfield Minnesota Police Department, Wendy Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Charise L Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hebert v. USA et al
as 6:2019cv00410
Plaintiff:
John Keith Hebert and Plata
Defendant:
Entire CIA Command Afghanistan, Office of Public Affairs, Triple Canopy Corporate Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kelley v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2017mc01198
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Kelley
Rossmann v. Pompeo et al
as 3:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Michael Pompeo, Christopher Wray, Michael Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-40792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN ROE, Esquire, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR, AUSA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Song et al
as 2:2017cv07023
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
