Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Blake v. Squires et al
as 3:2013cv02839
Plaintiff:
Thomas O Blake
Defendant:
Squires, G Miller, N Lotsopirch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Noel et al
as 4:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Miller
Defendant:
Faye Noel, Ricky Scott, Ed Thigpen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Merck & Co Inc Securities Derivative & ERISA Litigation
as 4:2012mc00299
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc , Raymond V Gilmartin , Peter S Kim and others
Alphonso et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03728
Plaintiff:
Darlene Alphonso , Lionel Joseph Alphonso , Pamela Brocato Alphonso and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Cavalier Homes, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Macalusa et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03510
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Macalusa , Sandra LaFargue Macalusa , Todd H. Macalusa and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
James Stern v. Barbara Dunn, et al
as 10-60607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H STERN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA DUNN, Hinds County Circuit Clerk, HINDS COUNTY, DOES 1-20 and others
James Miller v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10612
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES G. MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009xc00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Quarterman
as 5:2007cv00268
Petitioner:
James G Miller
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
