Cases 31 - 40 of 1,519
Harrison v. Iriarte et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Marco V. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Jesus Iriarte and Twenty4seven Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Schaffran v. Harrison County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael Shaun Schaffran
Defendant:
Harrison County Sheriff's Office and Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. CIR
as 24-20025
Plaintiff:
William Russell Harrison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Dori L. Stricklin, Group Manager, Miguel Pineda and others
Davidson v. Deputy A. Harrison et al
as 4:2023cv04814
Plaintiff:
Robert Davidson
Defendant:
Deputy A. Harrison, Deputy J. Jollah and Deputy V. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Brent Meyer, Wanda Mason, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04486
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estupinan v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv03098
Plaintiff:
Jose Hugo Estupinan
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gottman v. Harrison Co. Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Korey B. Gottman
Defendant:
Harrison Co. Adult Detention Center, Troy Peterson, Unnamed HCADC Officers and Medical Staff and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
