Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Rodriguez v. University of Texas Tech Health Science Center et al
as 6:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Erik M Rodriguez
Defendant:
University of Texas Tech Health Science Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Paul Shrode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Stephens et al
as 2:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Grady Allen Davis
Defendant:
William Stephens, Gary L Currie, Vickie Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Washington National Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00996
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Washington National Insurance Company , Conseco Life Insurance Company , Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Ferrell et al
as 2:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gene Copeland
Defendant:
Ronald Ferrell, James A. McKee, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. City of La Villa Texas et al
as 7:2013cv00400
Defendant:
City of La Villa Texas and Hector Elizondo
Plaintiff:
Antonia M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
USA v. Noe Rodriguez-Martinez
as 13-50554
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOE RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ, also known as Noe Martinez-Rodriguez, also known as Noe M. Rodriguez, also known as Noe Martinez, also known as Noe Rodriguez
Rodriguez et al v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03468
Plaintiff:
Viviano A. Rodriguez and Suzette M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osvaldo Rodriguez, et al v. CIR
as 12-60533
Petitioner - Appellant:
OSVALDO RODRIGUEZ and ANA M. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Rodriguez v. B & C Painting & Wallcovering, LLC
as 4:2011cv04438
Defendant:
B & C Painting & Wallcovering, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ediberto M Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
