Cases 31 - 40 of 232
Robertson v. Robertson et al
as 5:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Laticia Robertson, Mrs. Tina Witfield, NFN Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh et al v. Barbier et al
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brian Walsh
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, James W. Kupiec and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
Matranga v. Barbier et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patricia Matranga
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, James W. Kupiec and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Dent v. Knotts et al
as 3:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Demon Dent
Defendant:
Sanford Earl Knotts, Hinds County Sheriff's Department and Mississippi Bar Association
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford Holdings LLC v. DFL, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv01265
Plaintiff:
Sanford Holdings LLC
Defendant:
DFL, Inc., Bo Fontana, David DiPaola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zagami et al v. Barbier et al
as 1:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
Gary Zagami
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, James W. Kupiec and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
Sanford v. Harris County Commissioners Court et al
as 4:2021cv02662
Plaintiff:
Larry Samford and Larry Sanford
Defendant:
Harris County Commissioners Court, Lina Hidalgo, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bamdad v. Rivera
as 21-40571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Masoud Bamdad
Defendant / Appellee:
Rivera, Warden, FCI-Beaumont, Rivera J. Cline, Warden, T. Fazekos and others
Gatheright v. Sanford et al
as 6:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Toshemecia Gatheright
Defendant:
Piney Mountain Transport, LLC and Ronnie Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
