Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Assurance Company of America v. Seepe et al
as 3:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Assurance Company of America and Assurance Company of America
Defendant:
Mark Eric Seepe, Mark Seepe Funeral Home and Crematorium, Mark Seepe Funeral Directors & Crematorium and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown v. Lloyd's Syndicates 9056, 1225, 1007 and 2007 et al
as 3:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
William D Brown, William D Brown and William D Brown
Defendant:
Lloyd's Syndicates 9056, 1225, 1007 and 2007, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy Nos. NL000360f and NL000360g and Single Interest Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv05252
Plaintiff:
William Green, George Hood, Susan Hobert and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Single Source Inc v. Harvey et al
as 4:2007mc00416
Plaintiff:
Single Source Inc
Defendant:
Arlis Harvey and Food Marketing Concepts
Single Source, Inc. v. Harvey et al
as 3:2007mc00076
Plaintiff:
Single Source, Inc.
Defendant:
Arlis Harvey and Food Marketing Concepts
Movant:
Mid-America Services, Inc. and Mid-America Services, Inc.
Single Source, Inc. v. Harvey et al
as 3:2007mc00075
Plaintiff:
Single Source, Inc.
Defendant:
Arlis Harvey, Arlis Harvey, Arlis Harvey and others
Single Source, Inc. v. Harvey et al
as 3:2007mc00074
Plaintiff:
Single Source, Inc.
Defendant:
Arlis Harvey, Arlis Harvey, Arlis Harvey and others
Dearmore, et al v. City of Garland
as 06-11007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY DEARMORE, Individually and as Representative of all Owners of Single Family Residential Property in Garland Texas, A C BLAIR, Individually and as Representative of all Property Managers in Garland, Texas and MARIE COMBS, Individually and as Representative of all Tenants of Single Family Residential Property in Garland, TX
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF GARLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
