Cases 31 - 40 of 51
State of Texas et al v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, Jennifer Granholm, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy, Scott De La Vega, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
The State Of Texas, et al V Google, LLC
as 4:2020cv00957
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of North Dakota, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Gregg Abbott, et al
as 20-50264
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Respondent:
SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S SURGERY CENTER, WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
Petitioner:
KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing, PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, In re: GREGG ABBOTT, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Rust Rare Coin et al
as 1:2019mc01018
Defendant:
Aleesha Rust Franklin, Denise Gunderson Rust, R Legacy Investments and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and State of Utah Division Securities
Not Yet Classified:
Wayne Klein and Jonathan O. Hafen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hewitt v. Helix Engy Solutions Grp
as 19-20023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HEWITT
Defendant / Appellee:
HELIX WELL OPS, INCORPORATED and HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
Independent Petroleum Association of America, State of Mississippi, Offshore Operators Committee and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
State of Nevada, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-41130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ZIEGLER, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Policy of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Movant - Appellant:
TEXAS AFL-CIO
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, et al
as 17-10054
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ANDREW D. AUERBACH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Kennedy v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01116
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Republican National Party, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
