Cases 41 - 50 of 1,995
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford, Kerry P Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Jasmine Garcia, Jonathon J. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MURPHY
Defendant:
ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC. and TAYLOR PRIMEAUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Murphy v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murphy
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc, Taylor Primeaux, Ross Dress for Less, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Taylor v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John H. Taylor
Defendant:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director, Kevin Smith, Kareem Hayekco IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Southern Veterinary Partners, LLC
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Taylor Johnson
Defendant:
Southern Veterinary Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Taylor Marine Construction, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Taylor Marine Construction, Inc.
Claimant:
Donald Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Mikey Ray Taylor, Jr. and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
