Cases 41 - 50 of 466
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Heladas Ice House LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01836
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Heladas Ice House LLC as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program doing business as Heladas Ice House, Enrique Sanchez as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program doing business as Heladas Ice House, Erik Sanchez as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program, doing business as Heladas Ice House and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. CWIA Investments, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01838
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
CWIA Investments, LLC as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program doing business as The Blinde Pig, Juan C Carranza as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program doing business as The Blinde Pig, CWIA Investments, LLC individually doing business as The Blinde Pig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. T&D Restaurant, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01826
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
T&D Restaurant, LLC as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program, doing business as Culichi Town doing business as Culichi Town Houston, Dorian Espionza as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program, doing business as Culichi Town doing business as Culichi Town Houston and Valdemar Pindea as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program, doing business as Culichi Town doing business as Culichi Town Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Leche v. Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01309
Plaintiff:
June Leche
Defendant:
Standard Fire Insurance Company and Standard Fire Ins Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Anthony et al v. Dubay et al
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony and Patty Anthony
Defendant:
John Gordan Dubay, II, Robert David Dubay and June Faircloth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Scott v. Schnieder et al
as 2:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Vance R. Scott, Sr
Defendant:
Paul Schnieder, Paul Connick, Jr, K. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Zielinski et al
as 6:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Thompson, June Thompson and Sophia Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Zielinski, Epes Transport System L L C, Old Republic Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jeffries et al v. BSI Financial Services et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Jeffries and Jennifer Jeffries
Defendant:
BSI Financial Services, JUNE CHRISTY AS THE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARMENT OF SECRETARY VETERANS AFFAIRS OF WASHINGTON, D.C. and June Chisty
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
June v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 2:2021cv02398
Petitioner:
TIFFANY JUNE
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc, Home Depot USA Inc doing business as Home Depot Store No. 378 and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. $250,000 of the $1,150,000 in U.S. Currency Seized on June 11, 2021
as 2:2021cv00240
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$250,000 of $1,150,000 in U.S. Currency Seized on June 11, 2021 and $250,000 of the $1,150,000 in U.S. Currency Seized on June 11, 2021
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
