Cases 41 - 50 of 586
Cortez et al v. Barton et al
as 4:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Leland Cortez and Sofia Abbas
Defendant:
Canaan Barton, Shelly Israel, Tyler Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00156
Defendant:
Daniel Coban Barton, Live Oak County Jail, Live Oak County Sheriffs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby v. Barton et al
as 3:2022cv01447
Defendant:
2999TC Acquisitions LLC, Timothy L Barton, John Mcelwee and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
LINFO IP LLC v. E.C. BARTON & COMPANY
as 6:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
LINFO IP LLC
Defendant:
E.C. BARTON & COMPANY d/b/a HOME OUTLET and E.C. BARTON & COMPANY doing business as HOME OUTLET
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
USA v. Barton
as 22-50204
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cory Joe Barton
Barton v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv00753
Plaintiff:
Barbara Barton
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FILING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Attorney Bomani Barton and Bomani Barton
Defendant:
Kyu An
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Barton v. City of Austin, Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Bomani Barton
Defendant:
City of Austin, Texas and Kyu An
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
