Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Boothe v. Price et al
as 6:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
FNU . Price, John/Jane Doe, Jane 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boothe v. Campbell et al
as 6:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
James Campbell, Michael Lindsey, Robin Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Woodall
as 2:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Craig, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Woodall
as 1:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Craig, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Cain
as 2:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shows, et al, et al v. AEARO, et al
as 2:2003cv00375
Plaintiff:
Lee A Shows, et al, James V Anderson, Moses Felton and others
Cross Defendant:
AEARO
Defendant:
Clark Sales and Rental, Clark Sand Company, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Mississippi Valley Silica Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Lee v. Homan
as 2:2011cv00252
Plaintiff:
William Charles Lee
Defendant:
Terry Homan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00659
Petitioner:
Charles Lee
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al
as 2:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
Darnell Joseph Alexander , Steven Oneil Alexander , Terrance Joseph Antoine and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
