Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Dedrick v. Batts et al
as 7:2014cv00067
Respondent:
Warden Myron L. Batts, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Petitioner:
Jerry Lewis Dedrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kilgore v. Boright et al
as 3:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Winston Kilgore
Defendant:
Barry Boright, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., M. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashaad Ferguson
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer et al v. Womble et al
as 1:2013cv00689
Plaintiff:
Addones Spencer and John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bouman v. Broome et al
as 5:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
Chad Darrell Bouman
Defendant:
Brian Broome, Ruben A. Blair, Marcus Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzales v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Gonzales
Defendant:
Eric Holder , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. , Vance Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keys v. Framer et al
as 2:2013cv02806
Plaintiff:
Bobby Earl Keys
Defendant:
Mike Framer and Charles E Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv00601
Plaintiff:
Tyron Nunn
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, M. Martin, N Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nunn v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Tyron Nunn
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, M. Martin, N Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
