Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Blanton v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00620
Respondent:
David Paul
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Storm Blanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haro v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00514
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Plaintiff:
Javier Haro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quinones v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00505
Plaintiff:
Luis Quinones
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyers v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00501
Respondent:
David Paul
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Edward Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Velez, Jr. v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00478
Respondent:
David Paul
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Valdivia Velez Ignacio, Jr., Ignacio Valdivia Velez, Jr., Ignacio Valdivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Villanueva v. Unknown
as 3:2019cv00455
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Villanueva, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Paul and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schiff Fam Holdings NV, L.P. v. David Vicknair, et al
as 19-30489
Defendant / Appellee:
SMITH AND TREUTING, L.L.C., BRENNAN MACKEY PIZZOLATO, TITLE STREAM, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCHIFF FAMILY HOLDINGS NEVADA, L.P.
Leblanc v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09280
Plaintiff:
David Paul Leblanc
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Johnson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01060
Plaintiff:
David Paul Johnson
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
