Cases 41 - 50 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hicks v. USA
as 4:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walter v. M.T.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Bryant Walter and Walter Bryant
Defendant:
M.T.C., EMCF Maintenance Dept. Personnel, Unit Manager Derrick Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Porras et al
as 4:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cooper
Defendant:
Edwin Porras, Sysco Corporation and The Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whiting v. Haston et al
as 1:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
Lydell Whiting
Defendant:
Derrick Haston and Pharr Advance Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Derrick Warren
Defendant:
Wayne County by and through its Board of Supervisors doing business as Wayne County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff Jody Ashley, Cathy Roberts Robin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoard v. Vance
as 3:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dorez Hoard
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Lee D. Vance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
