Cases 41 - 50 of 404
Plaquemines Prsh v. Chevron USA
as 23-30364
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company, and Gulf Oil Corporation, Shell Offshore, Incorporated, Shell Oil Company and others
Williford v. Stott et al
as 3:2023cv00422
Petitioner:
Jonathan Williford
Respondent:
Unknown Stott and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bolden v. Bommery et al
as 3:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Clarence Bolden
Respondent:
Janorris Bommery and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaquemines Parish v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, Ex Rel Jeff Landry and Louisiana State, Through Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, Named as Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, L.L.C., Named as Successor in Interest to The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, Named as Successor in Interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated and others
Gordon v. Greene
as 23-30333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paula A. Gordon, individually and on behalf of minor grandchild, REP, real party in interest, REP
Defendant / Appellee:
Hunter V. Greene, Judge, The Family Court, Division D, Donald T. Johnson, Judge ad hoc, Prisca A. Zeigler, Assistant District Attorney and others
Banks v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Inmate Shanard Zelron Banks
Defendant:
Secretary James M LeBlanc and Warden Pat Book
Petitioner:
Shanard Zelron Banks
Respondent:
Pat Book, Jimmy Leblanc and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guidry v. Hooper
as 6:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Miles Guidry and Miles J Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA
as 23-30291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Getty Oil Company, Texas E&P Incorporated, Tide Water Associated Oil Company, Tidewater Oil Company and Texaco Producing, Incorporated and BP America Production Company, As Successor in Interest to Pan American Petroleum Corporation
Jefferson Parish v. Atlantic Richfield
as 23-30285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Atlantic Richfield Company, Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
