Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Central States et al v. Metroplex Industries, Inc
as 4:2010mc00101
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Metroplex Industries, Inc
McDougal v. USA
as 1:2010cv00024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Derrell McDougal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kaye v. Lone Star Fund V (U.S), LP et al
as 3:2009cv02263
Plaintiff:
William S. Kaye and William S. Kaye
Defendant:
Lone Star Fund V (U.S), LP, Lone Star Partners V, L.P., Lone Star Management Co. V, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Coastal Package Carriers of Alabama, Inc.
as 2:2009mc05931
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Coastal Package Carriers of Alabama, Inc.
McDougal v. City of Oxford, Mississippi et al
as 3:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
John Michael McDougal
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Mississippi and Aric Stratton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Robert W. McDougall
as 2:2009mc00004
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Robert W. McDougall
United States of America v. McDougall
as 2:2009mc00003
Respondent:
Virginia McDougall
Petitioner:
United States of America
McDougal v. Quarterman
as 7:2008cv00135
Petitioner:
Shawn Alan McDougal
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDougal v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv01681
Petitioner:
Shawn Alan McDougal
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Ratliff et al
as 2:2008mc04430
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
James L. Ratliff, M. J. Ratliff and Ratliff Family Living Trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
