Cases 41 - 50 of 1,396
Caceres et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jeydi Ramos Caceres and Karol Ortega Munguia
Defendant:
Rogelio Eduardo Rodriguez, Ramtex Recycling, Inc. and Berkley National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hetzer, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., et al.
as 5:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Adriana Hetzer, Darrell Hetzer, Jamie Ramos and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co. and The Personal Representative and/or Statutory Heir of the Estate of Robert Hetzer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
USA v. Medrano-Ramos
as 24-50154
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aleyda Medrano-Ramos
Daywalt v. Blanquiz et al
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
James Daywalt
Defendant:
Michael Blanquiz, Ramiro J. Juarez-Ramos, Rachel Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Causey
as 24-60080
Plaintiff:
Gabino Ramos Hernandez
Defendant:
Phillip Causey, John Doe, An Unknown Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officer and United States of America
Ramos Ramirez v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Carolina Ramos Ramirez
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ramos v. Jaime et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Sandalio Ramos
Respondent:
Felipe Jaime and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Ramos
as 24-40080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Deibi Ramos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
