Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Foster v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 5:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Niels Foster
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07857
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In re: Stryker Corporation, et al
as 17-20510
Petitioner:
In re: STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, MAKO SURGICAL CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
PPD ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.
King v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv07382
Plaintiff:
Bernard King
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mirage IP LLC v. Stryker Corporation
as 2:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Mirage IP LLC
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Morris v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02529
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Morris
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandberg v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Sandberg
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown and Debbie Brown
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Depreo et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 2:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Eido Depreo and Eileen Depreo
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendives v. Mendives et al
as 5:2016cv01022
Defendant:
Anthony Bancroft, Bexar County Civil District Court, Karen Crouch and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto C. Mendives, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
