Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 11,762
Lee v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Kyson Dewayne Lee
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John v. Grant et al
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner: Robert Charles John
Respondent: NFN Grant and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McGee v. Andrews et al
as 5:2024cv00410
Plaintiff: Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant: Warden Terry Andrews, Technician Buluti, Nurse Practician Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner: Joel Vargas
Respondent: Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morgan v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner: Gatlin Gary Morgan
Respondent: Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner: Raul Chavez
Respondent: Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant: Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner: Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent: Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Bickham
as 24-30246
Petitioner: Allen Odell Woods
Respondent: Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Conner v. Warden Caddo Correctional
as 24-30248
Petitioner: Albertus Conner, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Caddo Correctional Center

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?