Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Vickery v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00249
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Vickery
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickery v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00492
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Vickery
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobby Biffel v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10195
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY LEE BIFFEL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Stork et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv08162
Plaintiff:
Letekia Stork, Letekia Stork, Letekia Stork and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Owens et al v. Perry
as 4:2009cv03080
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Owens and George Wyatt
Defendant:
Rick Perry
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Biffel v. Livingston
as 1:2009cv00012
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Biffel
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Biffel v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2009cv00067
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Biffel
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 1:2008cv00622
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bell v. Kelly et al
as 4:2008cv00131
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Bell
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fletcher v. Quarterman
as 1:2007cv00136
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Fletcher
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
