Cases 51 - 60 of 218
Sharpless v. FBI
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDonald v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. McDonald
Defendant:
Kimbel L. Brown, Jack Robinson, Wilbur & Myrna George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
Melissa Wilson, David Wilson, Wanda Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01017
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
M. Smith, Merrick Garland, Collete Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Edmond v. Dallas FBI Agent Ann
as 3:2022cv02487
Plaintiff:
LaKeshia R Edmond
Defendant:
Dallas FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morrisson v. Sierra et al
as 3:2022cv02431
Plaintiff:
Alynda Dawn Morrisson
Defendant:
Archer Sierra, Mario Max Schawmberg Lippe, Daniel Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Connelly v. FBI CC Division et al
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Ryant Connelly
Defendant:
FBI CC Division and U. S. Attorney's Office CC Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. USA
as 22-50698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dylan Charles Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, FBI, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Stone v. McCraw et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Defendant:
Stephen C McCraw, Tammy Robinson, Marilyn Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edwin Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edwards v. Jack et al
as 4:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Ginger L. Edwards
Defendant:
Grant H. Jack, Richard "Dick" Smith, Dallas District Atty's Ofc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
