Cases 51 - 60 of 510
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Robinson Property Group, LLC
as 3:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sung Sil Moon
Defendant:
Robinson Property Group, LLC doing business as Horseshoe Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 3:2021cv00404
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland-Robinson v. Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00214
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phalandra Copeland-Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al. v. RiverHills Bank
as 3:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Abby Robinson and Ricky Robinson
Defendant:
John Doe Company 1-5, RiverHills Bank and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RiverHills Bank v. Robinson et al
as 3:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Ricky Robinson and Abby G. Robinson
Plaintiff:
RiverHills Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jackson v. Edmondson et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Steve Robinson, City of Union, MS, Bradley Edmondson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
LaKeevis Travon Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
