Cases 51 - 60 of 315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez, REGIO TRANSPORATION S.A. DE C.V. and Jorge Alberto Martinez doing business as Regio Transportation S.A. De C.V.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture in Rem
Hernandez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 7:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Geovani Hernandez
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Unknown Supervisor-Agent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gaytan Mendoza v. Mayorkas
as 23-20043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Maria Daniel Gaytan Mendoza
Defendant / Appellee:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ur M. Jaddou and Carroll Wallace
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
