Cases 61 - 70 of 441
Clark v. Crown Cork and Seal
as 3:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Crown Cork and Seal
Plaintiff:
Martha Faye Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ford v. Clarke County et al
as 2:2020cv00227
Defendant:
Barry White, Clarke County Jail, Clarke County and others
Plaintiff:
Delanney Kemon Ford
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gaitanis v. Clarke County et al
as 2:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Barry White, Sheriff Todd Kemp, Clarke County and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Farrell Gaitanis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocampo-Vergara v. Hughes et al
as 3:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Unknown Clark, Unknown Dean and Unknown Hughes
Plaintiff:
Salvador Ocampo-Vergara
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00594
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Teresa Kay Clark
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walker v. Robinson et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Demario Walker
Defendant:
Buffie Unknown, John Cooskey, Rita Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Regis Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00558
Defendant:
Regis Corporation doing business as SmartStyle Hair Salons by Regis and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lewis Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruitt v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00532
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Anthony Ball, Orlando Clark and Benny Dubaso
Plaintiff:
Henry James Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Clarke County, MS et al
as 3:2020cv00464
Defendant:
Clarke County, MS, Sheriff Todd Kemp, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
