Cases 61 - 70 of 123
Roberto Calderon v. Jeff Jerman, et al
as 15-50123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO CALDERON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF JERMAN, Officer, KERR COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF KERR and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RON SUTTON, Kerr County Attorney
Ables v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00871
Petitioner:
Breckley Lyn Ables
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calderon v City of Bandera et el
as 5:2014cv00881
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ables, Della Baker, Berger and others
Petitioner:
Robert Calderon
Respondent:
City of Bandera, County of Bandera and Sheriff's Office of Bandera City/County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Calderon v. Jerman et al
as 5:2014cv00854
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ables, Lee Barren, Chuck Bracter and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emigh et al v. West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv02808
Plaintiff:
Aaron Emigh , Glynn Able Benoit and Laura Allison Delouche
Defendant:
West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital , Highmark Inc , Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Ables v. USA
as 4:2014cv00734
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Breckley Lyn Ables
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Calderon v. Ables et al
as 5:2014cv00427
Defendant:
Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Bruce Curry, Phil Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Huerta
as 4:2014cv00396
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant:
Able Huerta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
