Cases 61 - 70 of 1,005
Fuentes v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
Tony Fuentes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
James B Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. United States
as 3:2022cv01618
Plaintiff:
James Michael Murray
Defendant:
United States and Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Younger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02222
Plaintiff:
Wesley Younger
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bush v. Watson
as 22-40418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. Watson, Unit Personnel Hansen, Lieutenant, Unit Personnel Maze and others
Benton v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Benton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunez-Reynoso v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keaton v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
Brad Keaton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Fed Bureau of Prisons
as 22-30349
Petitioner / Appellant:
Frederick Hamilton Banks
Respondent / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Sekou Ma'at
Zimmerman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jack Zimmerman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
