Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Rivas v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
as 1:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivas
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kelleher et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
as 1:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kelleher and Jose Dominguez
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. MSIP I Jackson LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00692
Plaintiff:
Derek Ford
Defendant:
MSIP I Jackson LLC, G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. and Fictitious Parties A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Juarez et al
as 5:2015cv00528
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Officer Cody Davis, Dominion Homeowners' Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Juarez et al
as 5:2015cv00416
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Officer Cody Davis, Dominion Homeowner's Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al v. United States Of America
as 3:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Ruth Beltran Esquivel and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Saenz v. The City of El Paso et al
as 3:2014cv00244
Defendant:
Greg Allen, John Doe, Jose Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Roswitha M. Saenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
