Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Ruben Anderson v. F. Gooden, et al
as 14-40954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN SOLIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
F. GOODEN, Captain, PRESNELL, Lieutenant, LEAKES, Lieutenant and others
Hathcock v. Godwin
as 4:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Harry Eugene Hathcock
Defendant:
Robbie B. Godwin, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Godwin Ojiaku
as 14-10844
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GODWIN OJIAKU
Robert Putnam v. David Traylor, et al
as 14-40668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARL PUTNAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF DAVID TRAYLOR, Rains County Sheriff Department, MICHAEL GODWIN, Deputy, JOHN DOE 5, Sheriff Deputy, Sued in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Godwin v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Taylor B. Godwin
Defendant:
United States of America, Monica P. Brown, Omni Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Godwin v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv01075
Plaintiff:
Carol Godwin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Anderson v. Gooden et al
as 5:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
F Gooden, FNU Foster, FNU Presnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Putnam v. David Traylor, et al
as 14-40155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARL PUTNAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF DAVID TRAYLOR, Rains County Sheriff Department, MICHAEL GODWIN, Deputy, JOHN DOE FIVE, Sheriff Deputy, Sued in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Godwin Ojiaku v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-60880
Petitioner:
GODWIN CHINEDU OJIAKU
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mansfield v. Bulmahn et al
as 2:2013cv06233
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Mansfield
Defendant:
T. Paul Bulmahn, Leland E. Tate, Albert L. Reese, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
