Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jeremy Ned
as 13-50847
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH NED
USA v. Jeremy Ned
as 13-50846
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH NED
Branch et al v. Southgroup Insurance & Financial Services et al
as 3:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Janet Branch and Dixie Branch
Defendant:
Southgroup Insurance & Financial Services , Patty McMurry and Ned Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4000 National Flood Insurance Act
Myers et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01023
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ned Myers and Barbara Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ned Biagas v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 13-30453
Petitioner - Appellant:
NED BIAGAS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Murphree v. Godshall
as 4:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Murphree
Defendant:
Ned A. Godshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ward v. Artiaga et al
as 5:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Ned Ward
Defendant:
Priscilla R Artiaga, Nathan L Alarcon and Joseph C Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A S J Interest, L.L.C., et al v. Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P.
as 12-30717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A S J INTEREST, L.L.C., ELEANOR SIMMONS CHILDRENS TRUST, ELEANOR SIMMONS MARITAL TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE LOUISIANA, L.P.
Harold Temple v. Marsha McCall, et al
as 12-30661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD H. TEMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHA PAUL MCCALL, MAJORIE RYALS PAUL, NED WALTER JENKINS, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
