Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Tamayo v. Sutton et al
as 6:2009cv00194
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Tamayo
Respondent:
Mike Sutton, United States Probation Office, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paul Chuka Ayika v. Armando Ochoa, et al
as 09-50709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BENJAMIN CHUKA AYIKA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARMANDO OCHOA, JAMES TAMAYO, KEVIN J. FARRELL and others
Tamayo-Martinez v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jose Bulmaro Tamayo-Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Daniel Tamayo
as 09-40609
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL J. TAMAYO
Ayika v. Ochoa et al
as 3:2009cv00235
Petitioner:
Paul Benjamin Chuka Ayika
Respondent:
Armando Ochoa, James Tamayo, Kevin J. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ayika v. Ochoa et al
as 7:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Paul Benjamin Chuka Ayika
Respondent:
Armando Ochoa, James Tamayo, Kevin J. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jorge Tamayo
as 09-20307
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE RODRIGUEZ TAMAYO, also known as Jorge Rodriguez, also known as Jorge Rodriguez-Tamayo, also known as Enrique George Tamay Rodriguez, also known as Jorge Tamayo Rodriguez, also known as Jorge Emrique Rodriguez
Tamayo v. USA
as 3:2009cv00094
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alejandro Tamayo
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Tamayo-Martinez
as 08-40572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE BULMARO TAMAYO-MARTINEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
