Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Herron v. Bergamos Spa Retreat
as 4:2008mc00400
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Herron
Defendant:
Bergamos Spa Retreat
Herron v. Delta and Pine Land Company
as 2:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jim Herron
Defendant:
Delta and Pine Land Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Herron v. Delta and Pine Land Company
as 2:2008cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Herron
Defendant:
Delta and Pine Land Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Herron et al v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 1:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Herron and Mary L. Herron
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wren v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-10139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK RAVENSHADOW WREN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, BILL PIERCE, EILEEN KENNEDY, Warden and others
Herron et al v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Herron and Cecile H. Herron
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tompson v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv09611
Plaintiff:
Herron Tompson
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herron v Quarterman
as 4:2007cv03877
Petitioner:
Larry Leonard Herron
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 4:2007cv00186
Plaintiff:
Herron Thompson
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Herron v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2007cv00251
Petitioner:
Bobby Herron
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
