Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 130
Winding v. Buscher et al
as 3:2013cv00858
Plaintiff: James C. Winding
Defendant: Jerry Buscher, M.T.C. Inc., O. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Buscher et al
as 4:2013cv00202
Plaintiff: James C. Winding
Defendant: Jerry Buscher, M.T.C. Inc., O. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis Jr. et al v. Direct Reconditioning, LLC.
as 4:2013cv03598
Plaintiff: Paul R. Davis Jr. and Ricky Beauchamps
Defendant: Direct Reconditioning, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Davis
as 6:2013cv00918
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Mark R Davis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Davis v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00755
Plaintiff: George R Davis
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Enrique Mosquera v. Deana Davis, et al
as 13-10936
Plaintiff - Appellant: ENRIQUE ANDRADE MOSQUERA
Defendant - Appellee: DEANA R. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, JOHN H ADAMS, Head Warden, ZONIA SCOTT, UGI and others
Winding v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv00509
Plaintiff: James C. Winding
Defendant: Simone Jones , R. Davis , Catherine Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Stephens
as 6:2013cv00246
Petitioner: Royal R. Davis, Sr.
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff: James C. Winding
Defendant: R. Davis, S. Dunn, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Guevara v. Deana Davis, et al
as 13-10689
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK PACO GUEVARA, also known as Frank Guevara, also known as Frank Ramirez Guevara
Defendant - Appellee: DEANA R. DAVIS, C.O. 5, ROBBIE L. HARRISON, C.O. 5, BRITTANI MCGHEE, Medical Staff and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?