Cases 71 - 80 of 109
Stovall v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv00409
Plaintiff:
Stephen R Stovall
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc , Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morneau v. Sims et al
as 5:2011cv01805
Defendant:
Mark D Sims, James Wolfe, Jackie Runion and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kellogg Morneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry Stovall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stovall et al v. Steelcase
as 2:2011cv00779
Plaintiff:
Sharon Stovall, Harry Stovall, Jr., Shaquetta Stovall and others
Defendant:
Steelcase Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carson v. Arnette et al
as 3:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
Arthur Carson
Defendant:
Dana Arnette and Carolyn Stovall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
as 2:2011cv00083
Defendant:
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stovall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall et al v. Nationwide Property And Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv04070
Plaintiff:
Harold Stovall and Shirli Stovall
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes et al v. Recreation By Design, LLC
as 2:2010cv02251
Plaintiff:
Tomaka Stokes , Bruce Nelson , Rhonda Green and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton Modelist v. Gray Miller, et al
as 10-20432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELTON R MODELIST
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAY H. MILLER, LINDSAY LEE LAMBERT, CHALISE R. STOVALL and others
Stovall v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00377
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Judge William S. Herbert, Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Stovall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
