Cases 81 - 90 of 381
Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery et al v. Bird Rides, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
David B. Montgomery and Tiffany T. Montgomery
Defendant:
Bird Rides, Inc., Bird Rides, Inc. doing business as Bird, John or Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Monk v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical, FNU Phipps, FNU Hillhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grizzle v. Marcum et al
as 4:2021cv03770
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Vance Marcum, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monacelli v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv02649
Plaintiff:
Steven M Monacelli
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reagan v. Finner et al
as 4:2021cv03411
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Reagan
Defendant:
Troy Finner, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1 et al v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2021cv03036
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Defendant:
Harris County of Texas, Lina Hidalgo, Rodney Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Cipriano Vargas
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, G Petry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lozada et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant:
Andrea Lozada, David Reed, Jr., Ricardo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macias v. White et al
as 6:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
Juan Macias
Defendant:
Dr. FNU White and FNU Does 2-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
