Cases 81 - 90 of 111
Duffy v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2012cv01871
Plaintiff:
Leon Duffy
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Dept of Corrections, Jack Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
Richard Duffy
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaisance et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00968
Plaintiff:
Jason Perkins , Camille Warren , Christian Pizani and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc. , BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Duffy v. James et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Danny Duffy
Defendant:
Lisa S James, Eddie C. Williams, Angela N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Behrns et al
as 1:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Duffy, Sr
Defendant:
Robert L Behrns and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lapeyrouse et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02992
Defendant:
BP America, Inc., BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Lapeyrouse Grocery, Inc. , Cecil Lapeyrouse , 4 Seasons Spa, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Duffy v. State of Texas
as 3:2011cv02209
Petitioner:
Andrew F Duffy, Jr
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Larry Duffie
as 11-10544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY JOE DUFFIE
Duffy v. Freeman et al
as 6:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Duffy, Sr
Defendant:
Mike Freeman
Respondent:
Joe Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv02168
Plaintiff:
Brian Duffy
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Sonja Prevost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
