Cases 81 - 90 of 1,234
Epps v. Zwolle Police Dept et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Epps
Defendant:
Zwolle Police Dept, Daniel Thomas, Marvin Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Myers
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Myers et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Marcus Myers and Keith Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holden v. Myers
as 23-30028
Petitioner / Appellant:
Vernon Holden
Respondent / Appellee:
Marcus Myers
Kinchen v. Myers
as 3:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerome Kinchen
Respondent:
Marcus Myers and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Johansen et al v. Myers et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Counter Defendant:
Lance Johansen and Mississippi Orthopedic Institute, PLLC
Defendant:
Phillip Myers, Paula Smith, John D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Reynolds v. Myers
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinchen v. Myers et al
as 2:2022cv05541
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Kinchen
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
