Cases 81 - 90 of 115
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. a California corporation dba 24 Hour Fitness v. Tan
as 4:2011cv04267
Plaintiff:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. a California corporation dba 24 Hour Fitness
Defendant:
Kelly Tan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huang v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00384
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chin-Tan Huang
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Lam et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 2:2011cv01274
Plaintiff:
Qui Lam , Bao Hung Inc , Ho Van Tran and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., Danos and Curole Marine Contractors, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Dinh Ho v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-20238
Petitioner - Appellant:
DINH TAN HO
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nguyen v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 1:2011cv00076
Plaintiff:
Huy Tan Nguyen
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London , Jim Foster and Affiliated Claims Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv05244
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04929
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coach, Inc. et al v. Hollywood Tanning Studio et al
as 4:2010cv04757
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Hollywood Tanning Studio and Tammy Robertson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
