Cases 81 - 90 of 168
Collett v. Collett et al
as 3:2017cv02684
Plaintiff:
Julia Nicolle Collett
Defendant:
Garland Collett, George McKearin, Ty Lindy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv08286
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz , Scott Spires , James Blankenship and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. 106th Judicial District Court of Gaines County Texas et al
as 5:2017cv00211
Petitioner:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Respondent:
106th Judicial District Court of Gaines County Texas, Arthur Aguilar, Jr., Gaines County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hengemuhle et al v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 4:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Scott Hengemuhle and Ty Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company and Robert Saucier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrell v. Lease Supervisors, LLC
as 7:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Ty Farrell
Defendant:
Lease Supervisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Sterling v. De Ville Asset Management Limited
as 4:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
Ty Qoreya Sterling
Defendant:
De Ville Asset Management Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hill v. Watkins et al
as 3:2017cv00494
Plaintiff:
Albert G Hill, III
Defendant:
Craig Watkins, Albert G Hill, Jr, Lyda Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Seminole Police Department et al
as 7:2017cv00013
Defendant:
Arthur Aguilar, Jr., Officer John Doe, Gaines County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00899
Plaintiff:
Ty'Breshia Cross and Toshia Cross
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
