Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-40612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, H. M. Pederson and S. Sanchez, Assistant Regional Director
Eldridge v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Donnell Eldridge
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, N Martin and H W Pederson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Pederson et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
H.M. Pederson, Ronald S. Ivey, FNU Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, H.M. Pederson and S. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Collier
as 23-20231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luis A. Mendoza
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Angela Chevalier, Moises Villalobos and others
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, H.M. Pederson and S. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
