Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Russell v. Rich
as 26-10672
Plaintiff:
John Russell
Defendant:
Amanda Rich and Richemont North America
Bear et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2026cv05778
Plaintiff:
AMANDA CAROLE BEAR and STEVEN BEAR
Defendant:
STATE FARM LLOYDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gordon v. Callegan et al
as 2:2026cv01604
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Gordon
Defendant:
Rickie Callegan, Karen Lyon, Barbara Morvant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lenoir et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2026cv05514
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lenoir and Amanda Lenoir
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Clark et al
as 3:2026cv00502
Plaintiff:
Tevin Aranzo Johnson
Defendant:
Eric Clark, Paris Griffin, Montiese Townsend and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00203
Plaintiff:
Amanda G. Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lanzone v. McLane et al
as 5:2026cv00142
Petitioner:
Larry Lanzone
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Management and Training Corporation, David Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc et al
as 4:2026cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michelle Davis
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group Inc, Amanda Hansen, Michael Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
