Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Ahir v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv02341
Plaintiff: Bhavik Ahir
Defendant: US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Jaddou and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50792
Plaintiff / Appellee: Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellant: Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
In re: Penny Clarkston
as 21-50708
Petitioner: In re: Penny Clarkston and Mark Lee Dickson
Respondent: Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Whole Woman's Health et al v. Jackson et al Featured Case
as 1:2021cv00616
Plaintiff: Whole Woman's Health, Alamo City Surgery Center PLLC on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Alamo Women's Reproductive Services and others
Defendant: Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co
as 6:2019cv00509
Plaintiff: Bhavik Patel
Defendant: Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whole Woman's Health, et al v. Charles Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-50484
Plaintiff - Appellee: WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH, BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center, LENDOL L. DAVIS, M.D. and others
Movant - Appellant: TEXAS CATHOLIC CONFERENCE
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES SMITH, Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, in his official capacity
Whole Woman's Health Alliance et al v. Ken Paxton et al
as 1:2018cv00500
Defendant: David Escamilla, Larry R. Faulkner, PH.D., Scott Freshour and others
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, Bhavik Kumar, M.D., M.P.H., Lilith Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whole Woman's Health, et al v. Ken Paxton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-51060
Plaintiff - Appellee: WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH, On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians and Patients, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians, and Patients, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES, On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians, and Patients and others
Defendant - Appellant: KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of Texas, In His Official Capacity, FAITH JOHNSON, District Attorney for Dallas County, In Her Official Capacity, SHAREN WILSON, Criminal District Attorney for Tarrant County, In Her Official Capacity and others
Whole Woman's Health et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2017cv00690
Plaintiff: Alamo City Surgery Center PLLC, Curtis Boyd, M.D., Alan Braid, M.D. and others
Defendant: Jaime Esparza, Faith Johnson, Nicholas LaHood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?