Cases 1 - 10 of 39
American Health Care Association et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION;, TEXAS HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION;, ARBROOK PLAZA; and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services;, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Americans for Beneficiary Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Americans for Beneficiary Choice and Senior Security Benefits, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KRS Properties, LLC et al v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KRS Properties, LLC and West Wharton Hospital District
Defendant:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and United States Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Defendant:
William Smith, James M Wilkerson, Equian, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
State of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 22-10049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission, (HSSC)
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE and others
Petitioner:
Representative Chip Roy
Amicus Curiae:
Representative Michael Burgess, Representative Dan Crenshaw, Representative Jake Ellzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Tyler Area Chamber of Commerce
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
