Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Huffines Retail Partners, L.P., et al v. Atlas Apartments Acquis,L.L.C., et alIn re: Huffines Retail Partners, L.P., et al v. Atlas Apartments Acquis,L.L.C., et al
as 20-10581
Petitioner:
COLIN 1996 INVESTMENT TRUST U/A/D/ MAY 10, 1996, As Successor in Interest to the Donald B. Huffines 1996 Children's Investment Trust Dated May 10, 1996, HUFFINES PLANO PROPERTIES, L.P., PHILLIP HUFFINES 1996 TRUST U/A/D JUNE 26, 1996, also known as Phillip Huffines 1996 Trust and others
Respondent:
STEVEN IVANKOVICH and ATLAS APARTMENTS ACQUISITION, L.L.C.
Huffines Retail Partners LP et al v. Atlas Apartments Acquisition LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02425
Plaintiff:
Benbrook Winchester, LP, The Russell 1996 Investment Trust U/A/D May 10, 1996, Huffines Plano Properties, LP and others
Defendant:
Atlas Apartments Acquisition, LLC, Steven Ivankovich and Atlas Apartments Acquisition LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nudelman, M.D. v. Volk, M.D. et al
as 5:2015cv00923
Defendant:
Daniel D Mais, M.D. and Emily Volk, M.D.
Petitioner:
Rodolfo J Nudelman, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hartley et al v. Freese & Goss, et al
as 3:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hartley , Minnie Copeland , Hazel Thigpen and others
Defendant:
Freese & Goss, PLLC , Richard A. Freese , Dennis C. Sweet, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. Joslin
as 2:2010cv00319
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Mays
Respondent:
Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Behm et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02728
Plaintiff:
William P. Behm, Darlene Kay Bell, Angelo P. Bennice and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
