Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
D.K. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv01274
Plaintiff: D.K.
Defendant: The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.K. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv01697
Plaintiff: D.K.
Defendant: The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.K. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv01818
Plaintiff: D.K.
Defendant: The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teamer v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00479
Plaintiff: Domanisha Teamer, Individually as next friend of D.K, a minor, Domanisha Teamer and D.K.
Defendant: Cintas Corporate Services, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ruiz et al v. Dee King Trucking, LP et al
as 5:2021cv00749
Plaintiff: David Paul Ruiz, Conroy Pinnock and Janice Marie Pinnock Smith
Defendant: Dee King Trucking, LP, Lancer Duke McCarty, D.K. Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Damion White We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-11614
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAMION KENTRELL WHITE, also known as D.K.
v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2012cv02230
Defendant: City of Shreveport, Cedric Glover, Willie Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.K. v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00160
Defendant: Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: D.K.
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?