Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Cavallo v. Hotel Finance Partners Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Teresa Cavallo
Defendant:
Hotel Finance Partners Inc., Daniel Lee Ritz and Zane D Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Johnson v. United Airlines Inc.
as 4:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Johnson
Defendant:
United Airlines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Frost v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Query et al v. USA et al
as 2:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Brandon Query and Jenna Query
Defendant:
USA, Bayne Jones Army Community Hospital, Brooke Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Beckley v. Hooper
as 23-30268
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Beckley
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Reed v. Lumpkin
as 23-40053
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Reed
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 22-20645
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Harrison
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Burmeister
as 22-50819
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Burmeister, also known as Daniel Burmeister
Frost v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckley v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Beckley
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
