Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mitchell v. Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop and First Choice Motors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mitchell
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. d/b/a Kroger Store No. 138 and The Kroger Co. doing business as Kroger Store No. 138
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greene et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
DONNA J BELL, LAURYN E LITTLE, RACHEL I PAEZ and others
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC., UNLAUB / CHANNEL BEARING & SUPPLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
Danielle Mitchell
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melanie Chisholm, et al v. Kathy Kliebert
as 13-30682
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAO PEREZ, on behalf of minor L.C., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, TARA BARRETT, on behalf of minor A.B., KIMBERLY OWENS, on behalf of minor F.F. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHY KLIEBERT, Interim Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Holmes et al v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08442
Plaintiff:
Randolph Holmes, Randolph Holmes, Barbara Smith and others
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Stockman et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07083
Plaintiff:
Mark Stockman, Mark Stockman, Mark Stockman and others
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
