Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Adams et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
David Riley Adams and Elizzebeth Nichole Loomis
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams v. Ezell et al
as 1:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
David R. Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Ezell and Tyrone Nelson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
David J Adams
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. David Adam
as 17-50728
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID JASON ADAMS
USA v. David Adam
as 17-50177
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID JASON ADAMS
True View Surgery Center One, L.P. et al v. MILA National Health Plan et al
as 4:2016cv01648
Defendant:
MILA National Health Plan, David F Adam, Benny Holland and others
Plaintiff:
True View Surgery Center One, L.P, True View Surgery Center One, L.P., Oprex Surgery (Houston), LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Adams v. Lauderdale County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
David L. Adams
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Detention Facility and Cedric Blanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Bank of America et al
as 3:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Blount
Defendant:
Bank of America and David C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Bank of America et al
as 3:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Blount
Defendant:
Bank of America and David C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
