Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphrey v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
David Ray Humphrey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Bush et al
as 3:2023cv02443
Plaintiff:
Cary A Ray
Defendant:
George Bush, Jr, Donald Trump, Ronald Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Devillier et al v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Plaintiff:
Richard & Wendy Devillier, Yale Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kyle H. Devillier, Chris & Darla Barrow and others
Interested Party:
CivilCorp, LLC and City of Anahuac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 23-10121
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Ray Baker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Johnson
as 22-30567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Ray Johnson
Atwood v. Christopher
as 22-20310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant / Appellee:
Kate E. Christopher, Executive Director Bryan Collier, Warden Steve McClarin and others
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00624
Petitioner:
David Ray Baker
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
